physicsfactor
Legend
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 16,664
Did you not watch the video???Axe I thought you cited Tre as 23% from 3 and only 70% from the line?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Did you not watch the video???Axe I thought you cited Tre as 23% from 3 and only 70% from the line?
Axe I thought you cited Tre as 23% from 3 and only 70% from the line?
Made free throw: check
Made 3-pointer: check
Full-court assist: check
Steal and layup for 2,000th point: check
Tre Stones.
Thanks Axe. Duval was a good finisher to start the year but has really gotten worse over the past few games and definitely has no pull up or floater game to speak of
I think Reddish has the biggest upside, but Tre and RJ will likely be more consistent. I wouldn't be surprised if Reddish led us in scoring, though, due to being the best three-point shooter.
Tre, Barrett, and Bolden are good defenders.Tre and Reddish are built to be Duke players. I'm interested to see how K used Barrett and Zion. I still think a Tre-Barrett-Cam-Z-Bolden lineup can be pretty damn good for K. Probably the #1 ranked offense with ease. I'd be shocked if that teams posts a top 50 D ranking though.
Why do I see people list Cam as the starting two next year? I feel like Cam would be the prototypical Duke 4 if not for Zion. Barrett seems like a typical Duke wing who will be forced to slide down to the 2, Cam forced to slide to the 3 and Z mans the 4 and possibly eats the 5.
Barrett is far thicker than Reddish, imo. Seems more like it would be Reddish at the 3 and Barrett at the 4.
Then again, Ingram mostly played the 4 at Duke. K doesn't exactly require a banger down there.
Barrett is far thicker than Reddish, imo. Seems more like it would be Reddish at the 3 and Barrett at the 4.
Then again, Ingram mostly played the 4 at Duke. K doesn't exactly require a banger down there.