By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!dukeberto said:Mainly because it would have been a better thrown ball. Coach Mo always said it's the WR's job to make the QB look good -- you can't have great catches unless it's a poorly thrown ball.
StopThePumpFakesShav said:
By the 2011-12 school year, according to self-disclosed data collected in the U.S. Department of Education’s annual Equity in Athletics report, Duke was spending $25.4 million in football—more than any current or incoming ACC school— against $20.5 million in revenue. It’s the only ACC football program that operates in the red, according to the same report, which does not include capital expenditures or money each institution allocates toward maintaining its facilities. (By contrast, Duke told the DOE that men’s basketball cleared nearly $9.8 million in profit during 2011-12.)
Topher said:Why the fuck are we spending more money than Clemson or Florida St on football? Funnel that money to players if you're just going to waste it, maybe we can land a DT of quality.