Is it really necessary for the Duke graphic to include the empty star signifying he's only a 4*?
I mean, he looks good, but he's kind of ranked in the "here's where good college players who don't go pro after one year are ranked" area.This range makes me salivate. Am I crazy or does he look a lot better than his ranking?
This range makes me salivate. Am I crazy or does he look a lot better than his ranking?
I guess his handle could improve and he isn't a freak athlete, but he seems to have some crucial strengths for a PG (shooting, frame/length, character) without any glaring weaknesses.
This range makes me salivate. Am I crazy or does he look a lot better than his ranking?
I guess his handle could improve and he isn't a freak athlete, but he seems to have some crucial strengths for a PG (shooting, frame/length, character) without any glaring weaknesses.
The biggest issue I saw is he moves pretty slow.