StopThePumpFakesShav
All American
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 9,199
Couldn't be K, since he prob just looks at PPG rather than advanced stats.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!No, Coach K probably looks at less stats than even that. He's all eye test.StopThePumpFakesShav said:Couldn't be K, since he prob just looks at PPG rather than advanced stats.
StopThePumpFakesShav said:The internet would break if it was either K or Roy. I assume we'll never find out?
ZackM said:physicsfactor said:Not lying, I had never heard of London Perrantes until I read his name just now on this thread. I had to look him up to see if he even played vs Duke.
@#23 DUKE
L 69-65 26 1-2 .500 0-0 .000 0-0 .000 2 3 0 0 2 1 2
He played 26 minutes but did nothing else. No wonder I don't remember him.
I'm going to assume the person that voted for him meant to vote for Jabari, but accidentally clicked the wrong check-box on the digital ballot.
rhfarmer said:I think both firings are misguided. BC clearly under performed, but they aren't going to get some plucky up and coming mid major to take the job because the plucky mid major jobs are better.
VPI, I don't get it. They were going to suck no matter who coached. They played hard and finished last. People expected them to finish last right?
the boogeyman said:rhfarmer said:I think both firings are misguided. BC clearly under performed, but they aren't going to get some plucky up and coming mid major to take the job because the plucky mid major jobs are better.
VPI, I don't get it. They were going to suck no matter who coached. They played hard and finished last. People expected them to finish last right?
That's the same type of stuff people used to say about Duke football. "Why fire roof after going 1-11? Nobody can win there, it's pointless to try." fans, alums, etc should expect better.
From the perspective of production, I thought both schools made poor decisions to fire greenburg and skinner, as just making the tournament is a pretty big accomplishment at either school. Both guys were apparently big jerks, though, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. Both schools can do a lot better than they are now, though. Johnson had a ton of experience at vt, so the transition wasn't supposed to be as painful as it would be for most new coaches. His recruiting sucked, though. Donahue did a decent job identifying talent, but 8 wins in your 4th year is completely unacceptable, regardless of how tough your non-conference schedule was.
both schools should at least be in constant contention for the NIT. outside of donahue's first season, neither was close.