- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 41,236
Isn't the idea that things changed very quickly between the time of the staff's latest public remarks regarding the injury, and they simply haven't said anything publicly since then?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!NCCUknow said:Yeah, at fort Bragg it was shin splints. Very possible that they have since learned that it is a stress fracture and are waiting to get a timetable or simply waiting until they have to tell people (beginning of regular season)
NOD said:It certainly is conceivable that what they thought was shin splints (aka medial tibial stress syndrome) was shown to be a hairline fracture on subsequent MRI. The first MRI might've just shown marrow edema/ periosteal reaction, but a follow-up could've shown an actual fracture. You need to realize that that MTSS is usually a precursor to tibiial stress fractures. What may have happened is that the first MRI showed the stress/ periosteal reaction, they thought it was just MTSS, and then, after a couple of weeks of rest, they repeated the MRI in hopes that the stress reaction would've dissipated due to lack of activity, and that they then realized there actually had been an underlying stress fracture.
NOD said:It certainly is conceivable that what they thought was shin splints (aka medial tibial stress syndrome) was shown to be a hairline fracture on subsequent MRI. The first MRI might've just shown marrow edema/ periosteal reaction, but a follow-up could've shown an actual fracture. You need to realize that that MTSS is usually a precursor to tibiial stress fractures. What may have happened is that the first MRI showed the stress/ periosteal reaction, they thought it was just MTSS, and then, after a couple of weeks of rest, they repeated the MRI in hopes that the stress reaction would've dissipated due to lack of activity, and that they then realized there actually had been an underlying stress fracture.
aiw said:NOD said:It certainly is conceivable that what they thought was shin splints (aka medial tibial stress syndrome) was shown to be a hairline fracture on subsequent MRI. The first MRI might've just shown marrow edema/ periosteal reaction, but a follow-up could've shown an actual fracture. You need to realize that that MTSS is usually a precursor to tibiial stress fractures. What may have happened is that the first MRI showed the stress/ periosteal reaction, they thought it was just MTSS, and then, after a couple of weeks of rest, they repeated the MRI in hopes that the stress reaction would've dissipated due to lack of activity, and that they then realized there actually had been an underlying stress fracture.
wikipedia
Yes but they did that so it wouldn't affect our tournament seeding. There's no logical reason to do it now, at least from my perspective.uncy12 said:Didn't the staff play it close to the vest on the Ryan Kelly injury? This would have a real odd turn to it if it's actually a stress fracture.
mbomb32 said:If Seth is out for a long Time Kentucky and tOSU could beat us. I mean QC and Sheed are a very raw but talented back court. we would have to hope that Mason and Ryan play HUGE!
ChibCU said:mbomb32 said:If Seth is out for a long Time Kentucky and tOSU could beat us. I mean QC and Sheed are a very raw but talented back court. we would have to hope that Mason and Ryan play HUGE!
Racist