By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!No, mid 70's on RT. So lower than a good SW movie, but not terrible. And not really any worse than you would expect for a Han Solo movie that nobody wanted. Might actually be an accomplishment in that regard. Most of the reviews are more or less, "Fun but nothing special."Reviews that bad?
People in the comments lol
I’m really scratching my head here. Are you referring to the comments, or the chronological listing of movies?Attack of the Clones too low
People in the comments lol
Rian Johnson in there.
I’m really scratching my head here. Are you referring to the comments, or the chronological listing of movies?Attack of the Clones too low
I know I'm a Star Wars homer, but Solo legitimately obliterated my expectations. It was the perfect follow-up to TLJ. A classic adventure film with lower stakes and tons of fun to be had. Basically Indiana Jones in space. Which isn't totally surprising, I guess, since Lawrence Kasdan wrote both of them.
I know I'm a Star Wars homer, but Solo legitimately obliterated my expectations. It was the perfect follow-up to TLJ. A classic adventure film with lower stakes and tons of fun to be had. Basically Indiana Jones in space. Which isn't totally surprising, I guess, since Lawrence Kasdan wrote both of them.
It was good. I wouldn't watch it again unless it was playing on TNT in the background, but it delivered on expectations.
Outside of like half a dozen lines though I couldn't buy the actor as Han, and never Glover as Lando. It kept pulling me out of the movie somewhat. Oh well.
Fuck that robot though. All these new droids suck.
You spelled Rogue One wrong ;)I know I'm a Star Wars homer, but Solo legitimately obliterated my expectations. It was the perfect follow-up to TLJ.